On Jul 8, 2015 6:59 AM, "Yann Ylavic" <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote: > > However maybe the proposed backport about mod_reqtimeout (PR 56729) is > worth being included too, but that's not a showstopper. > It somehow made his way through 2.2.30 already (r1678698) but for > 2.4.x this partial fix isn't enough (due to EOR handling). > Would be nice if it could be reviewed on time (my only vote so far...).
Since it is a security related defect (not exploitable, ergo not a vulnerability) I reviewed the 2.4 patch as well, thanks for pointing out the discrepancy.
