Sounds right... Actually a fusion between svn_cstring_* and several existing ap_ and apr_ functions would be useful.
SVN folk, any objection to APR appropriating these API's? 20/20 hindsight, is apr_cstring_ or shorter apr_cstr_ the way to go here? You all had to use the thing so I trust your preferences. Either expresses locale C in my mind, so they work for me. On Nov 26, 2015 07:38, "Jim Jagielski" <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > Yeah, SVN's 'svn_cstring_casecmp' and how it's used is > pretty much inline with my thoughts on how httpd would > use ours... > > > On Nov 25, 2015, at 5:10 PM, Bert Huijben <b...@qqmail.nl> wrote: > > > > We have a set of similar comparison functions in Subversion. I’m pretty > sure we already had these in the time we still had ebcdic support on trunk. > > (We removed that support years ago, but the code should still live on a > branch) > > > > Bert > > > > From: William A Rowe Jr [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net] > > Sent: woensdag 25 november 2015 22:55 > > To: httpd <dev@httpd.apache.org> > > Subject: Re: apr_token_* conclusions (was: Better casecmpstr[n]?) > > > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Christophe JAILLET < > christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> just in case off, gnome as a set of function g_ascii_... > >> (see > https://developer.gnome.org/glib/2.28/glib-String-Utility-Functions.html#g-ascii-strcasecmp > ) > > > > Interesting, does anyone know offhand whether these perform the expected > > or the stated behavior under EBCDIC environments? > >