Sounds right... Actually a fusion between svn_cstring_* and several
existing ap_ and apr_ functions would be useful.

SVN folk, any objection to APR appropriating these API's?  20/20 hindsight,
is apr_cstring_ or shorter apr_cstr_ the way to go here?  You all had to
use the thing so I trust your preferences.  Either expresses locale C in my
mind, so they work for me.
On Nov 26, 2015 07:38, "Jim Jagielski" <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:

> Yeah, SVN's 'svn_cstring_casecmp' and how it's used is
> pretty much inline with my thoughts on how httpd would
> use ours...
>
> > On Nov 25, 2015, at 5:10 PM, Bert Huijben <b...@qqmail.nl> wrote:
> >
> > We have a set of similar comparison functions in Subversion. I’m pretty
> sure we already had these in the time we still had ebcdic support on trunk.
> > (We removed that support years ago, but the code should still live on a
> branch)
> >
> > Bert
> >
> > From: William A Rowe Jr [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net]
> > Sent: woensdag 25 november 2015 22:55
> > To: httpd <dev@httpd.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: apr_token_* conclusions (was: Better casecmpstr[n]?)
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Christophe JAILLET <
> christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> just in case off, gnome as a set of function g_ascii_...
> >> (see
> https://developer.gnome.org/glib/2.28/glib-String-Utility-Functions.html#g-ascii-strcasecmp
> )
> >
> > Interesting, does anyone know offhand whether these perform the expected
> > or the stated behavior under EBCDIC environments?
>
>

Reply via email to