> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] > Gesendet: Montag, 15. Februar 2016 23:51 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: motorz > > The more I think of it, the more I think we should just > remove motorz and simple from trunk... Or keep them around > but not really worry about them. > > The fun and interesting stuff is already in event, and although > it might be nice to, for example, move the worker_pool stuff > to a simply apr_thread_pool, I wonder what it buys us, if > anything.
I guess APRisation has its benefits (but its drawbacks as well, due to the stricter versioning rules over there), but I guess we can do this iteratively with event. Nevertheless it might be good to keep motorz and simple around even if dormant to keep the ideas for these steps on the table. As you sound that you don't feel these steps are all too sexy for doing them they might be for someone else. Probably if someone can define them more clearly a project for GSOC? Regards Rüdiger
