On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 4:51 PM, <ic...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> +static void setup_slave_conn(conn_rec *c, void *csd)
>> +{
>> + event_conn_state_t *mcs;
>> + event_conn_state_t *cs;
>> +
>> + mcs = ap_get_module_config(c->master->conn_config, &mpm_event_module);
>> +
>> + cs = apr_pcalloc(c->pool, sizeof(*cs));
>> + cs->c = c;
>> + cs->r = NULL;
>> + cs->sc = mcs->sc;
>> + cs->suspended = 0;
>> + cs->p = c->pool;
>> + cs->bucket_alloc = c->bucket_alloc;
>
> Can the slave connection really have the same bucket_alloc as the master?
> Can't both be processed (i.e. process_socket) at the same time?
Forget that, I have read it as: cs->bucket_alloc = mcs->bucket_alloc :p
