On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:03 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:55 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> >> wrote: >> >>> Can anyone get mod_lbmethod_rr.c to build? >>> >> >> That's funny actually. The very first version README.cmake in trunk says >> that mod_lbmethod_rr.c doesn't build on Windows >> > > When I added the .dsp, it certainly did build. --enable-mods=all should > be > triggering the build of those sources. > > I think this illustrates that we have played fast and loose with something > that > 1. is a public API, 2. not experimental, and 3. was illustrated with an > example > that has been frequently broken by Major ABI changes. > > If devs want to promote an API and then continuously break ABI on trunk, > I'm way beyond arguing with such individuals. Just a few choice examples > which had necessitated major MMN bumps that did not receive one... > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1560081 > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1477649 (no > bitwise-alignment assurance) > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1436919 (no > bitwise-alignment assurance) > > However, this module appears to have been broken prior to 2.4.1 GA with > this > at least this commit... > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1209958 > ... which tells me it is simply an abandoned example. > > I propose we remove it from 2.4.x branch and trunk, rather than pretending > we have maintained it? > +1 for removing from 2.4.x branch no arguments here if someone actually wants it to hang around in trunk, but I don't actually know if anybody cares so no vote on trunk ATM... -- Born in Roswell... married an alien... http://emptyhammock.com/
