Hi Eric and Rüdiger, 2016-04-01 15:59 GMT+02:00 Rüdiger Plüm <r.pl...@gmx.de>:
> > > On 04/01/2016 03:48 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > > I am -0.9 on this info in the manual, for a relatively low severity bug. > > +1. We don't do this kind of stuff in the documentation. This is what > CHANGES and Bugzilla are for. > Yep I thought what was best too and decided to commit on trunk to gather some feedback. The Bug is low severity but as stated in users@ the documentation says X and httpd does the opposite, getting people confused. IMHO we should advertise directives that are not working properly with specific versions of httpd since most of the people does not read CHANGES and Bugzilla (also they tend to be a bit too dense for whoever is not familiar with httpd development/code), but I don't have also a lot of experience within the project to make a strong argument (plus I still need to learn a lot). Is there any compromise that we can think of to avoid a misleading documentation entry like this one? Thanks! Luca
