On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Stefan Eissing <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> wrote: > Today I Learned the difference between writing > DATA + META > and > DATA + META + FLUSH > to the core output filters. I am astonished that > my code ever worked. > > Seriously, what is the reason for this kind of > implementation?
Do you mean why META could be destroyed before (setaside-)DATA, in remove_empty_buckets()? > I would like to pass META buckets > in non-blocking way and *not* lose the order of > bucket destruction. Any explanation or advice is > appreciated! You'd want to setaside (some) META buckets with DATA (in order), right? At least for EOR buckets, that would keep requests in memory longer than necessary, but maybe some other META are worth it... Regards, Yann.
