Thx! Are any of these in trunk, or are they 2.4-branch specific?

> On Jun 9, 2016, at 1:03 PM, Jacob Champion <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> It may be too late now that the T&R machinery is in motion, but I'll bump 
> some of my patchsets:
> 
> - APXS: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58926
> 
> Quality-of-life improvements for users of the APXS tool, as well as some code 
> cleanup for the script itself.
> 
> - DUMP_INCLUDES: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59376
> 
> One possible implementation of a DUMP_INCLUDES option, which outputs a tree 
> of Included file locations to help users learn about and debug their 
> configurations. (This got a decent amount of interest on IRC! And appears to 
> have a +1 from gsmith?)
> 
> - CMake: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59685
> 
> On my Windows machine (running VS2015), the CMake build doesn't work out of 
> the box. This is the set of patches I'm currently using to fix it.
> 
> (I originally posted that set to dev@ as a git branch during the 
> mod_proxy_http2 build discussions. This morning, I rebased against trunk and 
> put it up on Bugzilla, so it looks "newer" than it is.)
> 
> - FastCGI: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59618
> 
> Some FastCGI implementations choke on the "proxy:fcgi" prefix that Apache 
> adds to its SCRIPT_FILENAME. (PHP is apparently hardcoded to ignore this 
> prefix. That is, IMHO, nasty.) This set strips that prefix before sending the 
> FCGI request, and there's an autotest to catch regressions.
> 
> There appears to be a significant amount of history behind that particular 
> bug, so it may be best to treat it as just a point of conversation at first.
> 
> Thanks for your consideration!
> 
> --Jacob

Reply via email to