Good point. On Jun 15, 2016 2:35 PM, "Gregg Smith" <g...@gknw.net> wrote:
> On 6/15/2016 9:20 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > >> In building httpd.exe, some users don't build and install openssl. It >> isn't >> going >> to be possible to simply #include<openssl/applink.c> without some >> conditional >> test. OpenSSL itself is partly the culprit, for not having an >> APPLINK_REQUIRED >> style macro conditional. But we can work around this in the cmake tests. >> >> > This is why the patch creator put this inside a HAVE_OPENSSL block so > ab.exe did not get this added. abs (at least on the dsp et. al.) is not > built unless there is OpenSSL present. > > I'll look at making this a standard bit of the httpd 2.4 build. We can >> likely >> add a user-toggled flag to the os/win32/os.h? >> > > Seems to me this is not needed . >
