ATTN Jim,

I presume you didn't read the note below?


On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 6:59 AM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
wrote:

> This looks inverted.  The buffer should be MAX+1.
>
> This logic error leads to paths valid in one context, which fail later in
> the next bit of code.
> On Jun 16, 2016 12:17 AM, <jaillet...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Author: jailletc36
>> Date: Thu Jun 16 05:17:35 2016
>> New Revision: 1748653
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1748653&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Fix a potential buffer overflow.
>>
>> Modified:
>>     httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/filters/sed0.c
>>
>> Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/filters/sed0.c
>> URL:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/filters/sed0.c?rev=1748653&r1=1748652&r2=1748653&view=diff
>>
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/filters/sed0.c (original)
>> +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/filters/sed0.c Thu Jun 16 05:17:35 2016
>> @@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ jtcommon:
>>                      command_errf(commands, SEDERR_SMMES,
>> commands->linebuf);
>>                      return -1;
>>                  }
>> -                if (text(commands, fnamebuf, &fnamebuf[APR_PATH_MAX]) ==
>> NULL) {
>> +                if (text(commands, fnamebuf, &fnamebuf[APR_PATH_MAX-1])
>> == NULL) {
>>                      command_errf(commands, SEDERR_FNTL,
>> commands->linebuf);
>>                      return -1;
>>                  }
>> @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ jtcommon:
>>                  command_errf(commands, SEDERR_SMMES, commands->linebuf);
>>                  return -1;
>>              }
>> -            if (text(commands, fnamebuf, &fnamebuf[APR_PATH_MAX]) ==
>> NULL) {
>> +            if (text(commands, fnamebuf, &fnamebuf[APR_PATH_MAX-1]) ==
>> NULL) {
>>                  command_errf(commands, SEDERR_FNTL, commands->linebuf);
>>                  return -1;
>>              }
>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to