On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:40 AM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > I'd prefer if you would not invalidate a vote that others present.
Sorry about that, I thought it was an oversight. > > I support the original patch. I reviewed and accept the amended patch also, > but it hasn't seen nearly the same scrutiny as the widely adopted patch > presented in the PR. > > You are free to vote for only the enhanced patch, of course, but whichever > attains three reviews, be it only the tested patch or the improved variant, > should be adopted just as soon as they are accepted. That's why I made the > status vote cumulative, so people could accept one or all of these > proposals. The issue is that the patch from PR 30144 is not really satisfactory (there were some PR fixed in 2.4.x since then, as I noted), so I'm -1 for it alone... Regards, Yann.
