On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 1:27 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> since Upgrade is an HTTP/1 feature, I don't find it too twisted... >> >> The primary goal would be to let the backend decide whether an Upgrade >> is to be done, or otherwise continue with HTTP (still parsing the >> response, filtering, caching, ...). >> > > Nope... a thousand times nope... > > The protocol, along with a host of headers, are a hop-by-hop entities. > They are not part of that discussion. > (However, proxy CONNECT exists for precisely this reason...)
