On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 11:10 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 9:33 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> >> wrote: >> > >> > It seems correcting the table is the correct way to go, by direct >> > observation, and placing great faith that other than 0x15/0x37, >> > the discrepancies between ASCII <> EBCDIC C0 mappings do >> > not vary widely between EBCDIC mapping choices. >> >> Maybe to be sure we could compare the current 'ucharmap' with some >> result of apr_xlate_conv_byte() for each byte? > > > Perhaps a VALIDATE_TABLE define for the builder, especially when > --with-maintainer-mode is given?
Maybe a small temporary main() run once would be enough, it's not as if it could change anytime soon, no?
