On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 12:44 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > Just to be clear, that is now 2 votes for eliminating the 'classic parser' > from all > of trunk, 2.4.x and 2.2.x branches, and using only the strict parser, > unconditionally. > > That's actually 3 votes for removing it from trunk, which I planned to do > already, > after 2.4 and 2.2 backports are in-sync with trunk.
Without yet reviewing the votes, I would (personally) think this kind of split makes it your call as the one neck deep in the issue & doing all the work. Thank you for your work on this. Maybe one last summary of your call, and a short window for strong objection/veto?
