Thanks Yann, I'll work from my notes and a fresh checkout to revise ASAP. On Aug 31, 2016 3:00 PM, "Yann Ylavic" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Yann Ylavic <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 9:47 PM, William A Rowe Jr <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Aug 31, 2016 2:31 PM, "Yann Ylavic" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 9:05 PM, William A Rowe Jr < > [email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > One more reviewer would be appreciated to get these in sync, in > >>> > preparation > >>> > for the stronger parser on both of the release branches. > >>> > >>> My +1 on backport-2.2.x-r892678.patch, but I couldn't apply > >>> backport-2.2.x-r951900-r1178566-r1185385-r1188745- > r1352911-r1433613.patch > >>> on the current 2.2.x... > >> > >> Just to clarify, these patches are necessarily cumulative > > > > I just backported the two accepted ones, still none of the two > > remaining ones applies cleanly (first)... > > Attached the failing hunks for server/protocol.c (with > backport-2.2.x-r951900-r1178566-r1185385-r1188745- > r1352911-r1433613.patch). >
