'bool' ??
> On Oct 5, 2016, at 8:50 AM, Nick Gearls <nickgea...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The proposed patch
> (https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34012&action=diff) is fully
> back-ward compatible and can save a lot of useless warnings in the log.
> Anyway to get somebody review it?
>
> Thanks
>
> On 06-07-2016 09:20, Nick Gearls wrote:
>> There's a patch (see https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59660)
>> containing both options (global directive + flag) for both warnings (nesting
>> & empty arguments)
>>
>>> Good point.
>>> A global option is not a good option as it would disable this very
>>> useful check for all macros.
>>>
>>> What about "<Macro /NoNestingCheck param1 param2 ..."?
>>>
>>> On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 10:19:24 -0400, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > What syntax would be the best one? maybe a (one character) /option after
>>> > the
>>> > Macro keyword?
>>> > Ex: "<Macro/n ...>" (and later "<Macro/ni ..." if we add another flag)
>>> Kinda ugly and probably breaks the core from recognizing "<Macro".
>>> Maybe a global directive to turn off the nesting check? Or a
>>> convention for the macro name? Or a second tag like
>>> <MacroNoNestingCheck> (bad name) that is a very thin wrapper around
>>> existing stuff?
>>
>
