Evgeny Kotkov <evgeny.kot...@visualsvn.com> writes: > However, the problem I described in this thread is different, and it just > happens to have the same visible consequence. > > What is probably more important, the dav_send_one_response() function > that has the flaw (see the proposed patch) *just* got promoted into a public > API, and will become the part of the next 2.4.x release [2]. So I prepared > the patch, assuming that it would be better to fix this before it becomes > public.
I committed the fix for dav_send_one_response() function in r1764040 [1], and proposed it for backport to 2.4.x. Apart from this, I committed the second patch that adds the note about the API issue in r1764043 [2]. [1] https://svn.apache.org/r1764040 [2] https://svn.apache.org/r1764043 Regards, Evgeny Kotkov