Right, though several people have requested it now as errata. Seems likely to be in the final update for STD.
....Roy > On Oct 14, 2016, at 2:16 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 3:48 PM, <wr...@apache.org> wrote: >> Author: wrowe >> Date: Fri Oct 14 20:48:43 2016 >> New Revision: 1764961 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1764961&view=rev >> Log: >> [...] >> Apply HttpProtocolOptions Strict to chunk header parsing, invalid >> whitespace is invalid, line termination must follow CRLF convention. >> >> [...] > >> static apr_status_t parse_chunk_size(http_ctx_t *ctx, const char *buffer, >> [...] > >> - else if (c == ' ' || c == '\t') { >> + else if (!strict && (c == ' ' || c == '\t')) { >> /* Be lenient up to 10 BWS (term from rfc7230 - 3.2.3). >> */ >> ctx->state = BODY_CHUNK_CR; > > I'm not sure where this myth came from... > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230#section-4.1 > > has *NO* provision for BWS in the chunk size.
