Hello Luca, note that "scoreboard is full" is caused for not being enough maxsparethreads available and event being constantly reclaming threads, so for the case you mention, the comment should rather go on MaxSpareThreads rather than ServerLimit.
2016-11-23 11:53 GMT+01:00 Luca Toscano <toscano.l...@gmail.com>: > Hi Stefan, > > 2016-11-21 23:13 GMT+01:00 <s...@apache.org>: > >> Author: sf >> Date: Mon Nov 21 22:13:05 2016 >> New Revision: 1770771 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1770771&view=rev >> Log: >> Describe new behavior of ServerLimit >> >> This has changed a bit after the fix for PR 53555. Better wording is >> welcome. >> >> > first of all thanks a lot for this big effort! I am still reading your > code and trying to understand how it works in detail, but I have some > suggestions on how to improve the docs: > > - in http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/mod/mpm_common.html#serverlimit > it would be great to have a little note section after the "With event, > increase this directive if the process number.." with a little background > about why event is special. Even something trivial as mentioning that > everything originated from reports of the "scoreboard is full, not at > MaxRequestWorkers" error could direct people from the search engines to the > httpd manual pages rather than random blogs. > - Some summaries and explanation that you wrote like > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53555#c39 (I know that > something has been changed in the meantime) would be really great to be > captured somewhere, maybe in https://httpd.apache.org/ > docs/trunk/mod/event.html. > > I am happy to help with some work (even after the votes) but since you > know really well the code there is a very high chance that the > documentation will be more accurate and reliable :) > > Thanks! > > Luca > > > > -- *Daniel Ferradal* IT Specialist email dferradal at gmail.com linkedin es.linkedin.com/in/danielferradal
