On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: >>> From what I can see, there are no show-stoppers and >>> all my tests show no regressions... >>> >>> Let's shoot for a T&R this (east coast) evening... how does >>> that sound? >> >> >> +1 & thanks > > Sorry to be a buzzkill but I just replied to an April commit related > to PR53555 that I'd like some of the resident big brains to consider > as it will be new. > > But I guess it can be done in parallel with the vote since we have > been delayed so much and it's got a fair chance to be no worse than > 2.4.23. > > I do not think it is a showstopper but I see a little smoke there that > e.g. ylavic or sf may be able to debunk or throw up a bigger flag on. >
Yann pointed out that the wakeup enhancement is not in 2.4.x so there is no 2.4.x risk here. -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com
