On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Eric Covener <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Yann Ylavic <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hmm, the wakeup patch isn't in 2.4.24/x already no? (not proposed, by >> me at least, too much changes in events already...). > > > You're right, my bad. I will followup in the release thread that it's > a red herring.
Ah ok, so you did not reproduced this with vanilla 2.4.x, right? BTW, I had issues while testing both sf's changes (now in 2.4.x), the wakeup ones and REUSEPORT altogether, with heavy requests/gracefuls scenario. But I couldn't terminate my tests and diagnostic (cleared box by a colleague, and then lack of time). I'll restart these tests as soon as possible, hoping that you found the culprit already ;)
