On 12/21/2016 08:25 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
In fact the tunnel allows any upgradable protocol to work with mod_proxy_wstunnel, checking for WebSocket prevents it, does it make sense to allow a list or a single parameter directive to allow other protocol (for example that works with "jboss-remoting" and probably a bunch of others)?
(I don't know the answer to your question in particular, but I think there was also discussion a while ago about a mod_proxy_tcp, which might be relevant to the discussion?)
--Jacob
