On 1/9/2017 8:49 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Once we backport to 2.4, it will be nigh-impossible to change > the name... > > As we *sure* we want to call it RemoteIPProxyProtocol instead > of just "regular" ProxyProtocol ? > > The latter just sounds and looks "more right" to me.
I still like RemoteIPProxyProtocol because I also like the idea of "namespacing" modules' directives. -- Daniel Ruggeri
