> On Jan 16, 2017, at 6:57 PM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net> wrote: > > For the most part, yes except the portions that make the header presence > optional (the HDR_MISSING case). Those were added as it came into the > code base to handle a use case I was working on. I've added some > comments inline since I won't have time to poke around myself for a > while yet. > > > For convenience, here's a link to the original code > > https://github.com/roadrunner2/mod-proxy-protocol/blob/master/mod_proxy_protocol.c >
Would it make sense to have the "stable" version available for backport, and keep in the WIP in trunk?
