Am 19.01.2017 um 16:34 schrieb Stefan Eissing:
> Yann might already have asked this: any chance to compile with symbols and 
> get a more readable stacktrace?

Yes just tell me how ;-) i'm using dpkg-buildpackage and dh_strip. I've
no idea why not all symbols are available.

Do i need to pass a specific option to configure

Stefan

>> Am 19.01.2017 um 16:30 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG 
>> <s.pri...@profihost.ag>:
>>
>> With stock 2.4.25 + patch i'm getting this one again:
>> (gdb) bt
>> #0  0x0000000000521dcd in h2_stream_out_prepare ()
>> #1  0x00007fc1a2feca80 in ?? ()
>> #2  0x00007fc1a2feca8c in ?? ()
>> #3  0x00007fc1a2feca90 in ?? ()
>> #4  0x00007fc1a057c0a0 in ?? ()
>> #5  0x00007fc1a057cdd8 in ?? ()
>> #6  0x00007fc1a2fecac0 in ?? ()
>> #7  0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
>>
>> Stefan
>>
>> Am 19.01.2017 um 16:28 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG:
>>> I'm now testing stock 2.4.25 + patch.
>>>
>>> May this configure option have an influence?
>>> --enable-nonportable-atomics=yes
>>>
>>> Greets,
>>> Stefan
>>>
>>> Am 19.01.2017 um 15:35 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
>>>> <s.pri...@profihost.ag> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> @Yann:
>>>>> should i use V7 or V6?
>>>>
>>>> I'd prefer you'd use none (such that we can verify the patch with
>>>> stock 2.4.25, modulo mod_http2), but if it's easier for you to
>>>> reproduce with an event's patch, please use the v6 (and if it fails
>>>> then v7, and if it fails then no patch, really).
>>>>
> 
> Stefan Eissing
> 
> <green/>bytes GmbH
> Hafenstrasse 16
> 48155 Münster
> www.greenbytes.de
> 

Reply via email to