On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Jacob Champion <champio...@gmail.com> wrote: > One last question before I promote -- the "ProxyFCGIBackend FPM" case > currently just fixes up the SCRIPT_NAME and nothing else. Are you both okay > with releasing that way, since there's a good chance any further fixups we > discover will need to live under a separate ProxyFCGIBackend setting for > compatibility?
I'm not worried, since we can now fix things up easier w/ config vs. code. -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com
