On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > >> On Jun 20, 2017, at 1:03 PM, Jacob Champion <champio...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 06/20/2017 10:00 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >>> You must presume it is in the wild, and shortening the exposure >>> by a matter of days isn't significant. >> >> My point is that we should fix it ASAP. Days vs. more days may not be >> significant, but days vs. months is definitely significant when it comes to >> bug-compatibility and user expectations. > > All this is, IMO, moot until we have a *patch*. Right now there > is a work-around, which, again IMO, reduces the "need" to release > something "now"... the only question is whether the patch changes > the behavior of the 2 current settings or whether it adds a 3rd > option (the latter is my recommendation).
To your point and Jacob's concern, whatever we settle on, we can surely add that upon adoption to
