Actually, I should have backed out rpluem's vote for the original one line patch.
Can we get one more pair of eyeballs (or cross-vote the other branch) so this is properly accepted? On Jun 28, 2017 10:49, <yla...@apache.org> wrote: > Author: ylavic > Date: Wed Jun 28 15:49:07 2017 > New Revision: 1800181 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1800181&view=rev > Log: > Vote, promote. > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS > > Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/ > STATUS?rev=1800181&r1=1800180&r2=1800181&view=diff > ============================================================ > ================== > --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original) > +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Wed Jun 28 15:49:07 2017 > @@ -116,6 +116,15 @@ RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS: > PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: > [ start all new proposals below, under PATCHES PROPOSED. ] > > + *) Restore single-char field names inadvertantly disallowed in 2.4.25. > + Message ID: <CAKQ1sVPrHx911sBDp3-BDsqS=qsQ > 4eap0zjsz42j_vuzv2s...@mail.gmail.com> > + Backports: r1800173 > + PR: 61220 > + Submitted by: ylavic > + trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1800173 (mod CHANGES) > + 2.4 patch: trunk works > + +1: wrowe, rpluem, ylavic > + > > PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: > [ New proposals should be added at the end of the list ] > @@ -218,13 +227,6 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: > 2.4.x patch: svn merge -c > 1551611,1783765,1788996,1788998,1789000,1795651 > ^/httpd/httpd/trunk . > +1: jailletc36, jim > > - *) Restore single-char field names inadvertantly disallowed in 2.2.32. > - Backports: r1800173 > - PR: 61220 > - Submitted by: ylavic > - trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1800173 (mod APLOGNO plus > CHANGES) > - 2.2 patch: Message ID: <CAKQ1sVPrHx911sBDp3-BDsqS=qsQ > 4eap0zjsz42j_vuzv2s...@mail.gmail.com> > - +1: wrowe, rpluem > > PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE BEING WORKED > [ New entries should be added at the START of the list ] > > >
