Actually, I should have backed out rpluem's vote for the original one line
patch.

Can we get one more pair of eyeballs (or cross-vote the other branch) so
this is properly accepted?


On Jun 28, 2017 10:49, <yla...@apache.org> wrote:

> Author: ylavic
> Date: Wed Jun 28 15:49:07 2017
> New Revision: 1800181
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1800181&view=rev
> Log:
> Vote, promote.
>
> Modified:
>     httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/
> STATUS?rev=1800181&r1=1800180&r2=1800181&view=diff
> ============================================================
> ==================
> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Wed Jun 28 15:49:07 2017
> @@ -116,6 +116,15 @@ RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
>  PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
>    [ start all new proposals below, under PATCHES PROPOSED. ]
>
> +   *) Restore single-char field names inadvertantly disallowed in 2.4.25.
> +      Message ID: <CAKQ1sVPrHx911sBDp3-BDsqS=qsQ
> 4eap0zjsz42j_vuzv2s...@mail.gmail.com>
> +      Backports: r1800173
> +      PR: 61220
> +      Submitted by: ylavic
> +      trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1800173 (mod CHANGES)
> +      2.4 patch: trunk works
> +      +1: wrowe, rpluem, ylavic
> +
>
>  PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
>    [ New proposals should be added at the end of the list ]
> @@ -218,13 +227,6 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
>        2.4.x patch: svn merge -c 
> 1551611,1783765,1788996,1788998,1789000,1795651
> ^/httpd/httpd/trunk .
>        +1: jailletc36, jim
>
> -   *) Restore single-char field names inadvertantly disallowed in 2.2.32.
> -      Backports: r1800173
> -      PR: 61220
> -      Submitted by: ylavic
> -      trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1800173 (mod APLOGNO plus
> CHANGES)
> -      2.2 patch: Message ID: <CAKQ1sVPrHx911sBDp3-BDsqS=qsQ
> 4eap0zjsz42j_vuzv2s...@mail.gmail.com>
> -      +1: wrowe, rpluem
>
>  PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE BEING WORKED
>    [ New entries should be added at the START of the list ]
>
>
>

Reply via email to