+1 Regards
Rüdiger > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Yann Ylavic [mailto:[email protected]] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. Oktober 2017 10:31 > An: httpd-dev <[email protected]> > Betreff: Re: Pruning working branches (Was: Re: Why?) > > I like this "attic" idea better, resurrecting something is easier if > you can find that it ever existed (w/o diving into svn history, à la > "svn delete"). > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Stefan Eissing > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks Greg. The proposed change is purely aestetic. You could make a > > dir /branches/attic" and move all candidates there. People wanting to > > "resurrect" them can simply move them back. This is not RCS. > > > >> Am 25.10.2017 um 20:21 schrieb Greg Stein <[email protected]>: > >> > >> To be clear: "delete" simply means "no longer seen in HEAD". This is > version control. The data cannot truly be deleted, so it can always be > revived. Or reviewed. > >> > >> On Oct 25, 2017 12:31, "Marion & Christophe JAILLET" > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Just to mention that before giving a +1, I made a copy of these > repositories in order to dig later on, in order to see if something > useful seems to be there. > >> Don't have that much time these days to play with httpd, but will do > and will report anything that looks valuable. > >> > >> CJ > >> > >> > >> Le 25/10/2017 à 14:29, Jim Jagielski a écrit : > >> Are there anything of "value" in any of those branches? > >> > >> If not, prune away! > >> > >> On Oct 24, 2017, at 9:11 AM, William A Rowe Jr <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:28 AM, Steffen <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Tuesday 24/10/2017 at 10:26, Steffen wrote: > >> > >> Can someone clean up the not needed anymore backports/branches > >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/ > >> > >> httpd 2.4.1 was tagged at r1243503. > >> > >> I'd propose we start by pruning all working branches not updated > since this tag. > >> > >> Thoughts? > >> > >> > >
