Re-kicking this discussion point. It seems really silly, if we have a LICENSE and NOTICE, that they still don't end up anywhere in the resulting binary build from `make install`, some 20 years later. [Note this is not true of the win32 nmake install, they are deposited in the resulting binary tree.]
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:32 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > This slightly overlaps what Jacob has been working on with his > schema for our autobuilds, wrapping up my own work and then > turning to his efforts to see where we have some good synergies > to exchange. > > One thing that has stood out, but I never claimed I had much > skill in the unix build schema (now other committers put me to > shame on win32, and I clean up most everyone else's autocrud > messes, odd... eh?) So I left it alone, but this seems silly now... > > On Unix, what about LICENSE and NOTICE (perhaps README > and CHANGES in the process?) Is there a reason, after insisting > loudly that the first two must be replicated, that we don't deposit > them somewhere in the build $(TARGET)? > > Opening this up for discussion, 1) should we? and 2) where to? > > Cheers, > > Bill
