Am 09.02.2018 um 21:21 schrieb Roy T. Fielding <field...@gbiv.com>:
>> On Feb 9, 2018, at 12:06 PM, Stefan Eissing <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> >> wrote: >>> Am 09.02.2018 um 16:12 schrieb Daniel <dferra...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> I'm getting lost. >>> >>> What would VirtualServer tag mean exactly? >>> >>> Thanks in advance and apologies for my slowness :) >> >> The intention of VirtualServer is to solve common properties >> for a range of VirtualHosts. It's a level between the global >> settings and individual vhosts. Think of it as having several >> sets of (nowadays) global configurations for a number of vhosts. > > Hmm, I think reuse of that VS name is confusing. How about > HostSet, HostGroup, GroupHost, or ServerGroup? You may know by now that I truly enjoy naming discussions here...;-) All those names are fine with me (except GroupHost). > FWIW, I think it is terribly poor practice to serve the same resources > via both https and http. Setting an auto-redirect would make more sense. Agreed, in general. There is the case of a server migration where temporarily both serve the same. Or, you serve a tls terminator on another port. -Stefan > > ....Roy >
