> Am 12.03.2018 um 11:23 schrieb Daniel Gruno <[email protected]>: > > Would it be possible to just have a link that always points to the > _current_ agreement, much like our docs have a /current/ directory that > always fetches you the current 2.4 docs?
More a question for Let's Encrypt than us. Legally, that would make the ToS agreement a bit meaningless, I assume. LE envisioned an interactive sign-up process, ironically for someone mandating automatic cert management, which does not fit our little web server. In interactive use, a LE client would create an account, the server would send the agreement URL back, the client would show it to the user, she clicks ok, the client sends the agreed URL back to LE. Since we do *not* want to be interactive on server start/reload, the only solution I could come up with is that the admin provides the agreement URL in the config. Note that this needs to happen only once. LE does not want to force re-agreement for accounts registered. That would wreak havoc on the whole automation process. Cheers, Stefan > > On 03/12/2018 11:03 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: >> >> >>> Am 12.03.2018 um 10:39 schrieb Luca Toscano <[email protected]>: >>> >>> Hi Stefan! >>> >>> 2018-03-12 10:29 GMT+01:00 Stefan Eissing <[email protected]>: >>> The recommended URL in our docs is wrong. The wrong one was introduced in >>> r1820464. >>> Supposedly as a fix to PR 35622. The proposed patch in the PR 35622 however >>> carries the correct URL. Not sure how that happened. It should be changed >>> in the docs. >>> >>> This elukey committer always makes mistakes, I am going to follow up with >>> him to make sure he stops :D :D :D >> >> He is a real DareDevil! >> >>> Jokes aside, iirc I think I checked in https://letsencrypt.org/repository/ >>> and copied the link "currently in effect", that now is: >>> >>> https://letsencrypt.org/documents/2017.11.15-LE-SA-v1.2.pdf >>> >>> So possibly the Let's encrypt documentation needs to be fixed as well? I'll >>> amend the link today in the docs though! >> >> I will contact LE. I think they need to accept the set of agreement URLs >> they use themselves on the site. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Stefan >> >>> >>>> Not sure this can voted as a -1 for 2.4.32 ? >>> >>> It certainly can. The more relevant question is: should it? >>> >>> I think not, it is a documentation change only, let's keep testing 2.4.32 :) >>> >>> Luca >> >
