On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:44 AM, Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 2:22 PM, Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Looks a serious regression. >>> >>> Reported: www.apachelounge.com/viewtopic.php?p=36597 >> >> It does not look like mod_slotmem_shm is used (missing some error >> logging from there), mod_slotmem_plain maybe? >> >> Also, more context would be appreciated, full/relevant VirtualHost >> config (including IP:port, ServerName/ServerAlias eventually >> "anonymized"), BalancerPersist on/off(?) and whether or not other >> balancers are configured elsewhere (i.e. full httpd.conf if >> possible...). >> >> Can Windows users reproduce this very basic case here with >> mod_slotmem_shm (it doesn't seem Windows specific to me)? > > Wait: > [pid 19136:tid 136] mod_proxy_balancer.c(917): AH01178: Doing > balancers create: 552, 1 (6) > [pid 19136:tid 136] mod_proxy_balancer.c(986): AH01184: Doing workers > create: balancer://mycluster (p111c5be7_mycluster), 984, 2 [0] > [pid 30160:tid 756] mod_proxy_balancer.c(917): AH01178: Doing > balancers create: 552, 1 (6) > [pid 30160:tid 756] (17)File exists: AH01179: balancer slotmem_create failed > > Two processes (PIDs) creating the same balancer, two httpd instances > with the same configuration?
> (IIRC, Windows MPM is threaded only, no "forking" right?). the parent and child both run postconfig though on Windows. -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com
