On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 6:43 PM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net> wrote: > On 4/18/2018 10:58 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >>> The release cycle is hours, to the benefit of all interested. Be it a >>> blocking bug fixed or a nice feature implemented. These are mostly people >>> who do it for fun. Some even run large server clusters, so a „hobbyist“ >>> label does not apply. >> Hours, yes, but we've had a willing RM, who has automated even >> more of this than Jim or I had, and has a very hard time finding >> any target to point to. E.g. "ok, that looks like the right resolution >> to the last of the regressions... let's..." ... "...oh there are all these >> other shiny objects in STATUS... rock-n-roll!!!" >> ... > > What's particularly interesting to me, as I follow the conversation in > my usual lurker-mode, is that Bill hit the nail on the head with this > observation. I was waiting for the dust to settle to run through the > scripts again for another T&R and release vote... but am not totally > sure if we're ready. (mea culpa: my brain melted as I tried to follow > the merging discussion so instead started parsing for "Yep. We're good > now.") > > My current read on the conversation is that we're happy (or maybe just > content) with the SSL merging fixes and we should prep to ship 2.4.34 as > a fix. Does anyone disagree?
I am not sure we have that fix yet in 2.4.x yet. I think we should call the proxy thing (62308) a showstopper and not roll a release without it.
