Wrong revision. Correct one is r1836472. Regards
Rüdiger > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group <ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com> > Gesendet: Montag, 23. Juli 2018 11:26 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: AW: ocsp_force_default initialized with UNSET in httpd 2.4.34 > > This is now backported to 2.4.x as r1555631 and will be part of the next > release. > > Regards > > Rüdiger > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Frank Meier <frank.me...@ergon.ch> > > Gesendet: Freitag, 20. Juli 2018 09:26 > > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > > Betreff: Re: ocsp_force_default initialized with UNSET in httpd 2.4.34 > > > > > > On 18/07/18 13:57, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > > > > > On 07/18/2018 11:44 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: > > >>> Am 18.07.2018 um 11:37 schrieb Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com>: > > >>> > > >>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 11:29 AM, Ruediger Pluem > <rpl...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > >>>> Good catch. Maybe a dirty working copy during backport? Yann? > > >>> Actually the change was in the proposed patch: > > >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/patches/2.4.x/ssl- > ocsp- > > enable-leaf.patch > > >>> A subtle difference between trunk and 2.4.x, around the change... > > >> Hmm, so I had the dirty working dir when creating the patch? I do > not > > remember messing with that setting, but obviously I was mistaken in > > doing it. > > >> > > >> So, patch 1 it is then, Rainer? > > >> > > > I changed my mind :-) Let's backport r1555631 from trunk which is > more > > or less patch 2. So we have aligned trunk and > > > 2.4.x here. r1555631 does not apply clean though, because r1826995, > > r1827001 are already backported, but this is fixable. > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Rüdiger > > Thanks Guys, so we will run with patch 2. For now. > > Just for other people to know if they hit this issue with 2.4.34 and > are > > not able to patch, there is a workaround: Explicitly setting the > > directive "SSLOCSPOverrideResponder" to "off" in the configuration > file > > does also "fix" the issue. > > > > Cheers, Frank
