Via inspection this looks quite sane. > On Aug 12, 2019, at 3:24 PM, Eric Covener <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Don, can you try this very similar patch? I applied yours to my > sandbox to get more context and made a few minor changes (including > pre-existing stuff that looked misleading) > > http://people.apache.org/~covener/trunk-proxy-segv.diff > >
- [PATCH 63503] - Reverse proxy server - SIGSEGV Don Poitras
- RE: [PATCH 63503] - Reverse proxy server - SIGSEGV Don Poitras
- Re: [PATCH 63503] - Reverse proxy server - SIGSEGV Eric Covener
- RE: [PATCH 63503] - Reverse proxy server - SIGSEGV Don Poitras
- Re: [PATCH 63503] - Reverse proxy server - SIGS... Eric Covener
- Re: [PATCH 63503] - Reverse proxy server - ... Eric Covener
- Re: [PATCH 63503] - Reverse proxy serv... Eric Covener
- Re: [PATCH 63503] - Reverse proxy ... Jim Jagielski
- RE: [PATCH 63503] - Reverse proxy ... Don Poitras
- Re: [PATCH 63503] - Reverse pr... Eric Covener
- RE: [PATCH 63503] - Reverse proxy server - SIGS... Don Poitras
- Re: [PATCH 63503] - Reverse proxy server - ... Eric Covener
- Re: [PATCH 63503] - Reverse proxy server - SIGSEGV Don Poitras
- Re: [PATCH 63503] - Reverse proxy server - SIGSEGV Eric Covener
- Re: [PATCH 63503] - Reverse proxy server - SIGSEGV Don Poitras
