On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:50 AM Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net> wrote:
>
> Hi, all;
>    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
> candidate tarball as 2.4.43:
> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>
> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
> sha1: 15d8605b094dfe5e283cd9e90770368dd14e26f2 *httpd-2.4.43.tar.gz
> sha256: 2624e92d89b20483caeffe514a7c7ba93ab13b650295ae330f01c35d5b50d87f
> *httpd-2.4.43.tar.gz
> sha512:
> d9879b8f8ef7d94dee1024e9c25b56d963a3b072520878a88a044629ad577c109a5456791b39016bf4f6672c04bf4a0e5cfd32381211e9acdc81d4a50b359e5e
> *httpd-2.4.43.tar.gz
>
> The SVN tag is '2.4.43' at r1875715.
>

Thank you Daniel!

+1 tested on AIX/xlc/ppc64.  Usual AIX / bad perl stuff only no regressions:

Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/ab/base.t                       (Wstat: 0 Tests: 5 Failed: 4)
  Failed tests:  1-4
t/ssl/ocsp.t                      (Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  2-3
t/ssl/proxy.t                     (Wstat: 0 Tests: 290 Failed: 123)
  Failed tests:  3-7, 173-290
Files=135, Tests=9940, 1108 wallclock secs ( 3.13 usr  0.43 sys +
55.74 cusr 25.49 csys = 84.79 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 3/135 test programs. 129/9940 subtests failed.



-- 
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com

Reply via email to