On 6/18/20 9:58 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > Provided that my above understanding is correct I see no real benefit any > longer in returning a 505 and I would > revert r1878708 and all the follow ups (from r1878926 only the changes to > modules/http2/h2_request.c and probably CHANGES as the > remaining changes are no functional changes to my understanding). Done as r1878984 and r1878985 Regards RĂ¼diger
- Re: Reject HTTP protocols >= 2.0 in ap_parse_request_... Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Reject HTTP protocols >= 2.0 in ap_parse_req... Ruediger Pluem
- Re: Reject HTTP protocols >= 2.0 in ap_parse... Stefan Eissing
- Re: Reject HTTP protocols >= 2.0 in ap_p... Ruediger Pluem
- Re: Reject HTTP protocols >= 2.0 in ... Stefan Eissing
- Re: Reject HTTP protocols >= 2.... Ruediger Pluem
- Re: Reject HTTP protocols >... William A Rowe Jr
- Re: Reject HTTP protocols >... Stefan Eissing
- Re: Reject HTTP protocols >... Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Reject HTTP protocols >... Ruediger Pluem
- Re: Reject HTTP protocols >... Ruediger Pluem
- Re: Reject HTTP protocols >... Stefan Eissing
- Re: Reject HTTP protocols >... Yann Ylavic