Folks, the hostility in this exchange isn't appropriate, especially the later messages.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 2:35 AM JunkYardMail1 <junkyardma...@frontier.com> wrote: > Getting sporadic not found (404) and redirects (301). These occur maybe > about 1 per 1000+ or so. > > The 404 responses are for existing content, and the 301 response make no > sense. Sometimes the redirect is to the same URL that was requested or to > something completely unrelated. > > I can go to these URL's just fine without getting not found or redirect. > > Apache/2.4.6 (CentOS) > Apr 2 2020 13:13:23 > This is, as pointed out, a users@ question. Please do be considerate of the fact that the developers spend their limited cycles to address problems in the current source code, and the request doesn't identify a source code defect. > perhaps try something a little more modern, 2.4.6 is _40_ releases old, That's not true, because (as you can see today)... > ASF is about to release 2.4.46 > and the 2.4.45 and 2.4.44 versions were not released. There are 16 skipped releases, and only 24 released versions of httpd 2.4 since 2.4.6 in July of 2013, 7 years ago. Either way, this is too old for the developers to spend attention on, as it has little relevance to the current project source code under development. This is a factual statement, if a bit blunt: and this question is better suited to users@ not dev@ > -- > Regards, > Noel Butler > > It is the package that is provided to CentOS 7. I'm not interested in > spending my life compiling packages. > And CentOS 8 is celebrating its first birthday in 7 weeks. Developers and fellow users are more inclined to answer questions directed at current operating systems. CentOS 7 maintainers will only be providing full updates into Q4 of this year, with limited maintenance patches into 2024. For support from the CentOS community, it's a good time to be migrating. As far as compiling packages, there are other rpm distribution channels to keep up with a more up-to-date flavor httpd without compiling packages. Let's try to keep thread redirections reasonably polite and presume best intentions?
