Thanks for the explanation!
On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 12:00 PM Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > On 6/4/21 8:35 AM, Nikita Popov wrote: > > Is it ok that we include an os-specific API into the main code, not > > into the APR project? > > You mean because the patch uses pthread_sigmask / sigprocmask? > IMHO this is ok as: > > 1. Prefork is not OS generic. > 2. APR currently does not offer what we need here. Getting an appropriate API > in a stable version of APR would require > to release a new minor version of APR (1.8.x) first. > 3. It would require raising the minimum version for APR in httpd to 1.8. This > might be fine for trunk, but should not be > done for 2.4.x where we would like to backport this fix to. > > Regards > > Rüdiger >
