OK, small hickup. The build shell for the manuals wants a JDK 1.8 or 11... uhm...I need a time machine, or we can change the check there.
Since I am not experienced in our manual stuff, can someone knowledgable check this? - Stefan > Am 01.09.2021 um 13:27 schrieb ste...@eissing.org: > > > >> Am 01.09.2021 um 13:15 schrieb Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com>: >> >> On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 6:08 AM ste...@eissing.org <ste...@eissing.org> wrote: >>> >>> Having a look at the release scripts and how they work. >>> >>> I think we can use SVN and its branches/tags in a bit smarter way >>> and make things easier. As Christophe mentioned, he would like a >>> "--dry-run" option, because when things do not run smoothly to the >>> end, you have not only a local messed-up state but the SVN repro >>> itself is also changed without easy remedies. >> >> LGTM. Maybe even separate -tmp and -candidate branches aren't needed? > > We can do without, yes. Seems more simple that way. > >> It's all scratch space for the RM. >> Does the release branch get moved to a tag at the end? > > Yes, that line was missing, I saw too late and did not > want to add another mail to my wall of text. So > >> svn mv branches/2.4.49-candidate tags/2.4.49 > > would be the last thing at the voting.
