re: *** SPAM *** svn commit: r1892963 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

[Marion et Christophe JAILLET]

 

 

 

 

 

> Message du 06/09/21 09:42
> De : ic...@apache.org
> A : c...@httpd.apache.org
> Copie à : 
> Objet : *** SPAM *** svn commit: r1892963 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
> 
> Author: icing
> Date: Mon Sep 6 07:42:34 2021
> New Revision: 1892963
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1892963&view=rev
> Log:
> assuming Christophe is for the backport he proposed. [skip ci]

Wrong assumption. :)

I sometimes propose for backport things that I don't vote for.
This happens when it really looks like a good candidate, but I don't have the 
knowledge to have my own opinion on it.
All I could do is to run the test framework, but travis already does it for us.

So, you don't have my +1 for this one :(
(but I'm sure Yann or anyone else will add his +1)

CJ

> 
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
> 
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
> URL: 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1892963&r1=1892962&r2=1892963&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Mon Sep 6 07:42:34 2021
> @@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
> *) mpm_prefork: mask signals during ap_run_child_init()
> trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1890465
> 2.4.x patch: svn merge -c 1890465 ^/httpd/httpd/trunk .
> - +1: 
> + +1: jailletc36, 
> 
> PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE BEING WORKED
> [ New entries should be added at the START of the list ]
> 
> 
>