On 9/22/21 8:31 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
> On 9/21/21 9:56 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>> I am just investigating a case where a httpd 2.4.49 gets stuck and as part
>> of the investigation
>> I am asking myself if we should count processes that die because of
>> MaxRequestsPerChild still count
>> to active_daemons?
>> Because if we do like today we may prevent replacement processes to be
>> started while the other processes die, e.g. if
>> active_daemons hits active_daemons_limit.
>
> Answering to my own question:
>
> We do decrement active_daemons if we shutdown a process because we have too
> much idle threads, but we don't do it if the child
> process decides on its own to die because of MaxRequestsPerChild. The below
> patch shoudl fix this. Opinions?
r1893520 / PR65592
Regards
Rüdiger
