Thanks for testing Dennis. We need to get this release out quick due to
regressions, so it wasn't the right moment to apply the OpenSSL patch.
I'm confident, that Joe's OpenSSL 3.0.0 patch will be included in the
next regular 2.4 release.
Best regards,
Rainer
Am 02.10.2021 um 13:01 schrieb Dennis Clarke:
On 10/1/21 10:40, ste...@eissing.org wrote:
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.50-rc1 as 2.4.50:
[ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
[ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
[ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
sha1: afac1bf6aaa84ea2878c56ed56a49f5efdd7ff73 *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
sha256: feb87f9cc60e02782d795d30cd60a36e918c82fe9a2e7363b0ae28a78be9613a
*httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
sha512:
3b5e06d8428f14bae8173dbb27921496831c7c14c31850d2df0c0d6f69e931bbf0e4e71c6a250b4f5c0d646d1b7da813bbe61711f8a79ab5f80d39dfd176f57c
*httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
+1: It's not just good, it's good with OpenSSL 1.1.1
On ye SPARC64 Solaris 10 server here it seems to work just fine with
OpenSSL 1.1.1l and of course it does not work ( yet ) with OpenSSL 3.0.0
and we already know that :
beta # /opt/bw/bin/apachectl start
httpd: Syntax error on line 99 of /opt/bw/etc/apache/httpd/httpd.conf:
Cannot load modules/mod_ssl.so into server: ld.so.1: httpd: fatal:
relocation error: file /opt/bw/modules/mod_ssl.so: symbol ERR_GET_FUNC:
referenced symbol not found
beta #
I don't know if trunk is functional and I have not really jumped on
trunk in a few weeks and I'll give that a whirl but autoconf/autoreconf
autotools madness was giving me hardship. At least last time I looked
which was 1893292 about two weeks ago.
Anyways 2.4.50 seems to work just fine with OpenSSL 1.1.1l for me.
