On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 07:30:37AM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > On 1/9/23 5:16 PM, Joe Orton wrote: > > It seems consistent with other error cases to return straight away, but > > I'm not following the second part, can you explain more? An 'N' > > followed by whitespace should be caught and treated as an error now (as > > desired & expected). > > Sorry for the confusion. It is treated as an error now. I was referring to my > other approach were it would not be caught. I also found another case that > would not be > caught by my proposal (an 'N' at the end of the string). Hence all good. Your > approach > is the correct and better one.
Ah, great, thanks for looking at it! Any chance of a +1 for the 2.4 backport? Just need one more vote :) Regards, Joe
