On 5/5/23 2:37 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Down-thread, Giovanni asks about security patch handling. We can continue to
> use repos/private/pmc/httpd/ for that. That area will
> not go away. If people want to go "all git", then Infra can provide projects
> with a single, private repository that would function
> similarly.
Thanks for pointing this out. I think the repos/private/pmc/httpd should still
stick in Subversion as it is now.
And it brings up another point: We need to adjust our release scripts once we
made a switch.
>
> IMO, I definitely think svn is a superior version control system to git. It
> is much more approachable and easy to use, compared to
> git. I helped to build svn, yet I use git daily; this isn't knee-jerk svn
> partisanship; svn is simply better/easier. But *GitHub*
And I still use it in other areas at $work that are not that much development
driven but need to version control mostly
text files and where the GitHub features are not needed / useful. For these
cases svn is clearly much better suited than git.
Regards
Rüdiger
