On 5/5/23 02:15, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 5/4/23 10:34 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
This is a formal vote on whether we should move our read/write repository from
Subversion to Git.
This means that our latest read/write repository will be no longer available
via svn.apache.org. It
will be available via Git at https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd-site.git
and https://github.com/apache/httpd.git.
Github also offers the possibility to use a Subversion client:
https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/working-with-subversion-on-github/support-for-subversion-clients
[ ]: Move the read/write repository from Subversion to Git and leverage the
features of Github (for now Actions and PR).
[ ]: Move the read/write repository from Subversion to Git, but I don't want to
work with Github and I will only work with
what gitbox.apache.org offers.
[ ]: Leave everything as is.
After thinking a lot I come to the conclusion it is time now to do this.
[X]: Move the read/write repository from Subversion to Git and leverage the
features of Github (for now Actions and PR).
Regards
Rüdiger
Why the assumption of Microsoft github? There is no reason to
migrate to a git service such as Microsoft github when sourcehut works
just fine as does a private git repo provided by Apache FSF itself.
--
Dennis Clarke
RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC
Four decades in production systems.
