On 10/16/23 2:38 PM, Joe Orton wrote: > BTW is modules/http2 really CTR for 2.4.x? STATUS says only > mod_proxy_http2 is. > > Anyway: I am +1 for r1913005 and r1913019 for 2.4.x, latter was > sufficient to get 2.4 building on RHEL8 again (if only we had a CI to do > this, oh...). I am also +1 on 1913020. Regards RĂ¼diger
- [PATCH] fix mod_h2 with older nghttp2 Joe Orton
- Re: [PATCH] fix mod_h2 with older nghttp2 Stefan Eissing via dev
- Re: [PATCH] fix mod_h2 with older nghttp2 Ruediger Pluem
- Re: [PATCH] fix mod_h2 with older nght... Joe Orton
- Re: [PATCH] fix mod_h2 with older ... Stefan Eissing via dev
- Re: [PATCH] fix mod_h2 with older ... Ruediger Pluem