On 10/16/23 2:38 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> BTW is modules/http2 really CTR for 2.4.x? STATUS says only 
> mod_proxy_http2 is.
> 
> Anyway: I am +1 for r1913005 and r1913019 for 2.4.x, latter was 
> sufficient to get 2.4 building on RHEL8 again (if only we had a CI to do 
> this, oh...).

I am also +1 on 1913020.

Regards

RĂ¼diger

Reply via email to