On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 3:43 PM Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 3:17 PM <minf...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Author: minfrin
> > Date: Sat Nov 18 14:17:11 2023
> > New Revision: 1913936
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1913936&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Update vote, note need for mmn bump.
> >
> > Modified:
> >     httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
> >
> > Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
> > URL: 
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1913936&r1=1913935&r2=1913936&view=diff
> > ==============================================================================
> > --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original)
> > +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Sat Nov 18 14:17:11 2023
> > @@ -174,10 +174,13 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
> >    *) mod_proxy: prevent bad busy values and problems with bybusyness
> >       Trunk version of patch:
> >         https://svn.apache.org/r1912245
> > +       https://svn.apache.org/r1913930
> >          svn merge -c 1912245 ^/httpd/httpd/trunk .
> > -     +1: jfclere, minfrin
> > +        svn merge -c 1913930 ^/httpd/httpd/trunk .
> > +     +1: minfrin, ylavic
> >       ylavic: +1 with r1913930, we can't provide exported functions w/o an
> >               ap_[proxy_] prefix.
> > +     minfrin: r1913930 added, votes reset, mmn bump needed
>
> Do we need an MMN bump for some ap_proxy_ functions added to
> proxy_util.h (non public header), though AP_PROXY_DECLARE()d because
> they need to be accessible from several proxy modules SSOs?

I meant DSOs here..

>
>
> Regards;
> Yann.

Reply via email to