On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 3:43 PM Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 3:17 PM <minf...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Author: minfrin > > Date: Sat Nov 18 14:17:11 2023 > > New Revision: 1913936 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1913936&view=rev > > Log: > > Update vote, note need for mmn bump. > > > > Modified: > > httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS > > > > Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS > > URL: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1913936&r1=1913935&r2=1913936&view=diff > > ============================================================================== > > --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original) > > +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Sat Nov 18 14:17:11 2023 > > @@ -174,10 +174,13 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: > > *) mod_proxy: prevent bad busy values and problems with bybusyness > > Trunk version of patch: > > https://svn.apache.org/r1912245 > > + https://svn.apache.org/r1913930 > > svn merge -c 1912245 ^/httpd/httpd/trunk . > > - +1: jfclere, minfrin > > + svn merge -c 1913930 ^/httpd/httpd/trunk . > > + +1: minfrin, ylavic > > ylavic: +1 with r1913930, we can't provide exported functions w/o an > > ap_[proxy_] prefix. > > + minfrin: r1913930 added, votes reset, mmn bump needed > > Do we need an MMN bump for some ap_proxy_ functions added to > proxy_util.h (non public header), though AP_PROXY_DECLARE()d because > they need to be accessible from several proxy modules SSOs?
I meant DSOs here.. > > > Regards; > Yann.