Hi Satish,

Those files are understandable i.e it seems your second update went to a
log file, then compaction was scheduled, the third one went to a new log
file.
Only issue could be the the query is not picking up the right InputFormat
or the Hive table is not registered with the correct
InputFormat/RecordReader.

I know you and Nishith were chatting about this on gh. but did you get the
table registered using sync tool and followed steps here
http://hudi.apache.org/querying_data.html#hive-rt-view ?
Otherwise, it could be that the query engine (I am assuming Hive?) could
just ignore all log files since they begin with"." and only reading parquet
files/

thanks
Vinoth

On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 9:33 PM SATISH SIDNAKOPPA <
satish.sidnakoppa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Vinoth,
>
> Missed while copying.
> PFB the list of files
>
> 14:45
> /apps/hive/warehouse/emp_mor_26/2019/09/22/.278a46f9--87a_20190426144153.log.1
> - has record that was updated in run 1
> 15:00
> /apps/hive/warehouse/emp_mor_26/2019/09/22/.278a46f9--87a_20190426144540.log.1
> - has record that was updated in run 2 and run 3
> 14:41 /apps/hive/warehouse/emp_mor_26/2019/09/22/.hoodie_partition_metadata
> 14:41
> /apps/hive/warehouse/emp_mor_26/2019/09/22/278a46f9--87a_0_20190426144153.parquet
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 8:26 PM Vinoth Chandar <vin...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Satish,
> >
> > There are no parquet files? Can you share the full listing of files in
> the
> > partition?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Vinoth
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 7:22 AM SATISH SIDNAKOPPA <
> > satish.sidnakoppa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Yes,
> > > As this needed discussion ,the thread was created in google groups for
> > > inputs.
> > > I am unable to read from rt table after multiple updates.
> > >
> > > 14:45
> > >
> >
> /apps/hive/warehouse/emp_mor_26/2019/09/22/.278a46f9--87a_20190426144153.log.1
> > > -* has record that was updated in run 1*
> > > 15:00
> > >
> >
> /apps/hive/warehouse/emp_mor_26/2019/09/22/.278a46f9--87a_20190426144540.log.1
> > > - *has record that was updated in run 2 and run 3*
> > > 14:41
> > /apps/hive/warehouse/emp_mor_26/2019/09/22/.hoodie_partition_metadata
> > > 14:41
> > >
> >
> /apps/hive/warehouse/emp_mor_26/2019/09/22/278a46f9--87a_0_20190426144153.parquet
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 7:24 PM SATISH SIDNAKOPPA <
> > > satish.sidnakoppa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > No ,the issue is faced with rt table created by sync tool .
> > > >
> > > > On Fri 26 Apr, 2019, 11:53 PM Vinoth Chandar <vin...@apache.org
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> once you registered the rt table, is this working now for you?
> > > >>
> > > >> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 9:36 AM SATISH SIDNAKOPPA <
> > > >> satish.sidnakoppa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > I am querying real time view of the table.
> > > >> > This table (emp_mor_26_rt) created after runsync tool.
> > > >> > So the first updated record are fetched from log1 file.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Only after third update both the updates are placed in log files.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Fri 26 Apr, 2019, 6:30 PM Vinoth Chandar <vin...@apache.org
> > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Looks like you are querying the RO table? If so, the query only
> > hits
> > > >> > > parquet file; which was probably generated during the first
> upsert
> > > and
> > > >> > all
> > > >> > > others went to the log. Unless compaction runs, it wont show up
> on
> > > ro
> > > >> > table
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > If you want the latest merged view you need to query the RT
> table.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Does that sound applicable?
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 3:02 AM satish.sidnakoppa...@gmail.com
> <
> > > >> > > satish.sidnakoppa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > Writing hudi set as below
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > ds.withColumn("emp_name",lit("upd1
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> Emily")).withColumn("ts",current_timestamp).write.format("com.uber.hoodie")
> > > >> > > > .option(HoodieWriteConfig.TABLE_NAME,"emp_mor_26")
> > > >> > > >
> .option(DataSourceWriteOptions.RECORDKEY_FIELD_OPT_KEY,"emp_id")
> > > >> > > >
> > > .option(DataSourceWriteOptions.STORAGE_TYPE_OPT_KEY,"MERGE_ON_READ")
> > > >> > > > .option(DataSourceWriteOptions.PARTITIONPATH_FIELD_OPT_KEY,
> > > >> "part_by")
> > > >> > > > .option("hoodie.upsert.shuffle.parallelism",4)
> > > >> > > > .mode(SaveMode.Append)
> > > >> > > > .save("/apps/hive/warehouse/emp_mor_26")
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > 1st run - write record 1,"hudi_045",current_timestamp as ts
> > > >> > > > read result -- 1, hudi_045
> > > >> > > > 2nd run - write record 1,"hudi_046",current_timestamp as ts
> > > >> > > > read result -- 1,hudi_046
> > > >> > > > 3rd run -- write record 1, "hoodie_123",current_timestamp as
> ts
> > > >> > > > read result --- 1,hudi_046
> > > >> > > > 4th run -- write record 1, "hdie_1232324",current_timestamp as
> > ts
> > > >> > > > read result --- 1,hudi_046
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > after multiple updates to same record ,
> > > >> > > > the generated  log.1 has multiple instances of the same
> record.
> > > >> > > > At this point the updated record is not fetched.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > 14:45
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> /apps/hive/warehouse/emp_mor_26/2019/09/22/.278a46f9--87a_20190426144153.log.1
> > > >> > > > - has record that was updated in run 1
> > > >> > > > 15:00
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> /apps/hive/warehouse/emp_mor_26/2019/09/22/.278a46f9--87a_20190426144540.log.1
> > > >> > > > - has record that was updated in run 2 and run 3
> > > >> > > > 14:41
> > > >> > >
> > > /apps/hive/warehouse/emp_mor_26/2019/09/22/.hoodie_partition_metadata
> > > >> > > > 14:41
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> /apps/hive/warehouse/emp_mor_26/2019/09/22/278a46f9--87a_0_20190426144153.parquet
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > So is there any compaction to be enabled before reading or
> while
> > > >> > writing
> > > >> > > .
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to